How To Get Drug Charges Dismissed

Drugs

Drug charges can get dismissed, but it is not easy.
However, there are a number of ways to do this.
The chances of getting your charges dropped depend on a number of factors.
We’ve put this article together to help you understand what’s involved.

What type of drug charges are you facing?

First off, it is important to know the amount (weight) of drugs that you were in possession of.
The greater the “weight” or amount of drugs found in your possession, the more serious the consequences.
If you were charged with small amounts of drugs (for personal use), your matter will be treated as a misdemeanor.
An example of a small amount would be less than 50 grams of marijuana.
The maximum penalties for misdemeanor drug charges are up to six months in jail and up to a $1,000.00 fine.
All other drug possession charges are treated as felony matters.
You will be facing either 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th-degree felony charges.

How Were The Drugs Seized?

Next, we need to learn exactly “how” the drugs were discovered to be in your possession.
For example, these are the kinds of questions that we need to raise:

  • Was your vehicle searched during a “traffic stop”?
  • What was the reason for the stop?
  • Was it a legal stop?

If you were searched during a traffic stop in NJ, it’s necessary to learn how the police gained access to you search your car.
For example,

  • Could the drugs be seen through the window?
  • In legal terms, were the drugs in “plain view”?
  • Did you have a bag of weed on your dashboard or bundled in your trunk?
  • Did your car smell like weed?
  • Did you give consent to search?

In other words, before the cop asked for consent to search your car, we need to know:

  • What the police officer noticed that caused him/her to seek consent?
  • Did the police officer observe any signs of criminal activity before asking to search?
  • Or, did the officer search because of “a hunch” that there might be drugs in your car?

These are the types of legal questions that narrow the focus of our legal arguments.

The bottom line:
If you were the victim of an “illegal search”, then the drug evidence in your case can get “suppressed”.
When the evidence cannot come into trial, your drug charges will get dismissed.

What is an Illegal Search?

An illegal search violates your 4th Amendment rights.

To keep it really simple, the 4th Amendment protects your “privacy”.

You have a “reasonable” expectation in your person, paper, house, and effects.

This means that the police (government actors) cannot search these things without a warrant. For example, if the police want to search your home, they need a warrant.

If they do not have a warrant & search your home & find drugs, this would be a good example of an illegal search.

The result of an illegal search is that the evidence obtained from the unlawful search cannot be introduced in court.

In legal terms, this is known as the “exclusionary rule”.

However, it is not so always so simple.

There are many exceptions to the 4th Amendment’s “warrant requirement”.

These are called “warrantless search exceptions”.

A well-known example is the “exigent circumstances” exception.

Exigent circumstances are defined as:
“circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of the suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law enforcement efforts.”

The important to remember when it comes to getting your drug charges dismissed is this:
There are a number of factors to consider when determining whether law enforcement’s search was reasonable.

If the search was “unreasonable” it still may be a legal search if it falls under an exception.

Click here for a full guide on Warrantless Search Exceptions

Motions To Suppress Are The Key to getting drug charges dismissed

I’m going to keep this real simple.
A motion to suppress (MTS) is the legal tool that lawyers use to ask to get drug charges dismissed.
When a MTS is filed, the judge (court) will decide whether the search was legal.
To do this, the court holds a hearing.
In essence, the MTS hearing is a mini-trial.
The prosecutor brings the police officer who arrested you to court & asks him to explain all the steps he took to find the “illegal drugs”.
When the prosecutor finishes his/her line of questioning, it is our attorneys’ turn to cross-examine the cop.
Your criminal defense attorney must be thoroughly prepared by the time you get to this stage in your drug case.
We research the related law and we use the law to guide us during our questioning of the police officer.
After all of the witnesses are finished testifying, both prosecutor and defense lawyer argue the case to the judge.
It is our job to show the court that the way you or your home or car was searched, was illegal.
If the judge finds that the search was indeed illegal, the cure or remedy for this Constitutional violation is to keep the drugs out of evidence.

Challenging the legality of the traffic stop

There’s a statistic that over 90 percent of all criminal arrests arise out of traffic stops.

Although I don’t trust statistics because of how they can be manipulated, it does seem like over 90% of our drug case result from a traffic stop.

If this is the case, the first thing we do is investigate to see if the traffic stop or the search violated the Constitution.

We start each drug possession case with the following questions:

  • Why was our client pulled over
  • Did the police officer have “reasonable & articulable” suspicion for the stop?
  • Was the vehicle searched?
  • Was Consent given for the search?
  • Did the police have Probable Cause to search?
  • Where in the vehicle were the drugs found?

If any of your Constitutional Rights were violated, we file a Motion to Suppress the Evidence.
Once the judge decides that the search was unconstitutional, then that evidence cannot be used at trial. (see above)

Did Canines Find The Drugs?

“Either you cooperate OR I have to get the canine unit out here!”

Did this happen to you?

  • Were you given an ultimatum to either cooperate OR get in worse trouble

Police threaten to bring the canine unit all the time. 

The irony is that many police departments don’t even have canine units. 

They don’t have the funding. It’s often just a bluff. 

Yet, people agree to “searches” of their car because they believe they will be punished if they exercise their right to refuse.

  • Were you told that you had a right to refuse the search?
  • Was your initial traffic stop complete by the time the canine’s arrived?
  • How long did it take the canine unit to arrive?

These answers will determine if the evidence can be suppressed. 

If the drug evidence is suppressed, your drug charges will get dismissed.

Starting to see a pattern here?

Were the Drugs Properly tested?

Whenever you are charged with a drug crime, the government has to prove that the substance you had in your possession was indeed an illegal drug.

How are drugs tested?

Every local police department sends their drug evidence to a scientific testing lab.

In NJ, all of the evidence is sent to the New Jersey State Police Laboratory

Once it gets to the lab, it has to get tested in many ways.

A qualified scientist has to perform each test.

These scientists have to test the drugs in a certain way and with certain equipment.

They also have to keep records of every test. 
Once the tests are completed, those records are provided to your criminal defense lawyer.

If the drugs are not tested properly by the right person in the right way, and within a certain amount of time, we will file another Motion to Suppress.

A few years ago, the State of New Jersey had a lot of trouble with a person who worked at the laboratory

Instead of testing the drug evidence properly, this employee was lying about it. As you can imagine, many cases got dismissed.

In another scandal, Annie Dookhan, a Massachusettes State Laboratory chemist tampered with 15,570 drug tests. She falsified records & committed perjury when she testified at trial regarding her drug tests.

Because of Ms. Dookhan, thousands were convicted of cocaine possession.
During their investigation, detectives learned that the substance she certified to be cocaine turned out to be sodium chloride (table salt).

As a result of Ms. Dookhan’s crimes, thousands of innocent people got their drug charges dropped.

Arrested with Co-Defendants?
Who Do The Drugs Belong To?

People smoke in groups.

No surprise here.

But can 4 people all be in “Possession” of one joint?

Or, what if you gave someone a ride and they had weed in their backpack?

Here’s another possibility:

Someone you gave a ride to in high school (5 yrs ago) dropped a roach in your backseat. 

You get pulled over for speeding, the cops search and find marijuana in your car.

Should you be charged with a crime that has a perfectly logical explanation?

Can the Prosecutor prove that the roach belonged to you?

If one of your co-defendants takes responsibility for the marijuana in your car, then we file another Motion to Dismiss the charges against you.

Are you starting to see the many different strategies we use to get your drug charges dismissed?

Final Thoughts

As you have read, there are many ways to get your drug charges dismissed.

Every case is different.

Sometimes it takes one way to win.

Sometimes it takes all five ways to win.

And sometimes, we can’t win no matter how many ways we try.

The important thing is to never go down without a fight.

Please visit the Areas We Serve & Practice Areas pages for more information.

Take advantage of our FREE consultations.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email

How We Can Help

Regardless of the criminal charges you are facing, we are here to defend & protect you. Whether you are facing a restraining order, drug charge, theft charge, or aggravated assault charge, we are here to help you. Even a DWI case can really complicate your life.

If we can’t get your charges dismissed, we can either get them downgraded or place you in a diversionary program. The point is, our criminal defense lawyers will fight tirelessly to get you the best result possible. Take advantage of our free consultation to see how we can help.

Our Experience

You or a loved one have been arrested. Understandably, you are terrified & have a lot of questions. You’ve heard about plea bargains & probation, but the process is overwhelming. You want a local attorney near you to represent you.

Mr. Peyrouton is from Ridgewood & handles all types of criminal matters in New Jersey The New Jersey Law Journal recently published one of his articles on the subject of criminal law.

Our Practice Areas

Below you will find some but not all of our practice areas. Of course, if you do not see your criminal charges listed, feel free to contact us for a free consultation. We will meet with you to discuss your case & to answer all of your legal concerns. Se habla español tambien!

Areas We Serve

Get Help With Your Case

How Do Your Free Consultations Work?

There are plenty of excellent Hackensack criminal lawyers in our area. Most, if not all of them, offer free, 20-minute, consultations. However, our free consultations do not have a time limit. You will never feel rushed.

The best way for us to help you is to patiently listen to your side of the story. Your version of events will serve as the basis for your legal defense. It is during these initial meetings that your memory of the event is fresh in your mind. Why we would rush you during such an important aspect of your case.

We understand that your choice of attorney could mean the difference between your freedom and spending years behind bars. 

When you hire an attorney, you are entering a long-term relationship. For this reason, it is important that you feel comfortable with the team of Hackensack criminal lawyers that will represent you.

What our clients say about us

Peyrouton Law
5.0
Based on 159 reviews
I know good
I know good
20:54 27 Apr 22
Kraemers liquor store
Glenn Newmark
Glenn Newmark
21:58 22 Mar 22
Alan is a consummate pro. I hired him to help represent me on a delicate personal matter. First of all his initial consultation was spot on. Second of all his fees were fair and resonable. Third of all - He was extremely responsive and responsible it’s clear that he actually cares about his work and the people he represents. Finally the positive results he obtained for me. speak for themselves.
Ana puello
Ana puello
15:59 21 Mar 22
Thank you so much for your help and fast work I highly recommend it
Mary Pierson
Mary Pierson
00:51 21 Mar 22
Alan Peyrouton is a excellent attorney. He was able to advise and to represent me wisely. I would refer him to anyone in need of counsel.
Brian Vargas
Brian Vargas
19:05 18 Mar 22
Alan is a very good attorney.
Mauricio Caceres
Mauricio Caceres
19:05 18 Mar 22
Let me start by saying that Alan and Kevin gave me my life back. I was been charged with different charges and facing over 15 years in jail.When i first walk into their office i was scared and uncertain of what my future was going to be but thanks to these two great men i got my life back. I explained my situation and how i was falsely accused and they could see that i was telling the true. They became more than a bodyguard on my behalf. They defended me like if i was their son or a relative. Expended extended hours on my case, any other lawyer would charge a very large amount of money.They did an awesome job and i have a personal appreciation for them.The outcome of my situation was incredibly. Didn't have to go to trial even though they were more than ready, no jail time, no probation or PTI. For my career it was awesome because i have a secret clearance and anything other than a small fine would jeopardize it.I would like to thank them and If you ever need a knowledge lawyer call them they are the best.Quiesiera empesar por decir que Alan y Kevin me devolvieron mi vida. Estaba en la situation que podia ver unos 15 años en la carcel.La primera vez que entre a su officina yo tenia miedo e inseguro de lo que esperaba del futuro. Le explique mi situacion e inmediatamente se dieron cuenta que decia la verdad sobre las falsas acusaciones. En ese momento tomaron mi caso y se volvieron mas que mis guarda espalda. Pelearon por mi como si yo fuera su hijo o algun pariente. Trabajaron muchisimas horas que cualquier otro abogado me ubiera cobrado muchisimo. En este caso tenia un dos por uno. Le tengo un aprecio personal a los dos.Al final los resultados fueron sorpredientes. No tube ningun tipo de probacion o PTI. Para el trabajo que hago cualquier cargo que no sea una pequeña multa afectaria mi trabajo. Ademas tengo una segurida secreta y para aquirir ese tipo de suguridad es muy dificil.Le quiero dar las gracias a los dos y recomendarlos a cualquiera que tenga algun problema con la ley
Melissa d
Melissa d
00:29 06 Jan 22
Chung Lin
Chung Lin
03:35 12 Nov 21
Alexandra Pena
Alexandra Pena
01:03 22 Oct 21
From the very start of hiring Mr. Peyrouton to represent my son’s case in court, he reassured me that he and Samera would be available at any time if I had any questions or concerns along the way and he followed through on that. I am very satisfied with his services and the outcome of the case. He went above and beyond by also making sure there would be no legal long-term repercussions for my son. I appreciate his swift handling of the whole situation...I most definitely recommend Peyrouton Law!!
Gloria Brown
Gloria Brown
20:40 13 Sep 21
I spoke with Samira and she is the best. I can't think her enough for her time and understanding. I was so lost about this case thats hurting me and my family. I truly thank her not many will explain nor take the time without a fee. Samira if you ever become an attorney... You Are Hired 👊👍 I thank this firm for having a great person on their team.

A person extorts if he purposely threatens to:

a. Inflict bodily injury on or physically confine or restrain anyone or commit any other criminal offense;
b. Accuse anyone of an offense or cause charges of an offense to be instituted against any person;
c. Expose or publicize any secret or any asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or to impair his credit or business repute;
d. Take or withhold action as an official, or cause an official to take or withhold action;
e. Bring about or continue a strike, boycott or other collective action, if the property is not demanded or received for the benefit of the group in whose interest the actor purports to act;
f. Testify or provide information or withhold testimony or information with respect to another’s legal claim or defense; or
g. Inflict any other harm which would not substantially benefit the actor but which is calculated to materially harm another person.

***It is an affirmative defense to prosecution based on paragraphs b, c, d or f that the property obtained was honestly claimed as restitution or indemnification for harm done in the circumstances or as lawful compensation for property or services.

Reasonable Articulable Suspicion

Reasonable suspicion is a “search” standard that applies in criminal law.

When a police officer conducts a warrantless search, and does not have probable cause to justify the search, the courts look to see if the police had
a “reasonable & articulable suspicion” for the search.

A mere “hunch” is not enough.

In other words, a police officer has to provide an acceptable explanation for the search.

United States Constitution

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

NJSA - 2C:43-7.2.
Eligibility for parole;
persons convicted of certain violent crimes

a. A court imposing a sentence of incarceration for a crime of the first or second degree enumerated in subsection d. of this section shall fix a minimum term of 85% of the sentence imposed, during which the defendant shall not be eligible for parole.


b. The minimum term required by subsection a. of this section shall be fixed as a part of every sentence of incarceration imposed upon every conviction of a crime enumerated in subsection d. of this section, whether the sentence of incarceration is determined pursuant to N.J.S.2C:43-6, N.J.S.2C:43-7, N.J.S.2C:11-3 or any other provision of law, and shall be calculated based upon the sentence of incarceration actually imposed. The provisions of subsection a. of this section shall not be construed or applied to reduce the time that must be served before eligibility for parole by an inmate sentenced to a mandatory minimum period of incarceration. Solely for the purpose of calculating the minimum term of parole ineligibility pursuant to subsection a. of this section, a sentence of life imprisonment shall be deemed to be 75 years.


c. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary and in addition to any other sentence imposed, a court imposing a minimum period of parole ineligibility of 85 percent of the sentence pursuant to this section shall also impose a five-year term of parole supervision if the defendant is being sentenced for a crime of the first degree, or a three-year term of parole supervision if the defendant is being sentenced for a crime of the second degree. The term of parole supervision shall commence upon the completion of the sentence of incarceration imposed by the court pursuant to subsection a. of this section unless the defendant is serving a sentence of incarceration for another crime at the time he completes the sentence of incarceration imposed pursuant to subsection a., in which case the term of parole supervision shall commence immediately upon the defendant’s release from incarceration. During the term of parole supervision the defendant shall remain in release status in the community in the legal custody of the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and shall be supervised by the State Parole Board as if on parole and shall be subject to the provisions and conditions

Felony Degree

Prison & Fines

Examples

First-Degree

1st-degree felony charges in NJ are reserved for the most serious criminal offenses. Prison terms start at a minimum of 10 years in prison.

Second-Degree

2nd-degree felony charges carry 5-10 yrs in prison.
These charges can often be “downgraded” to 3rd or 4th-degree crimes.

Third-Degree

3rd-degree felony charges carry 3-5 years.
You have a good shot at PTI if you are charged with a 3rd-degree.

Fourth-Degree

4th-degree felony charges carry up to 18 months in jail. These cases can get “remanded” to a lower court. In this way, you will be out of “felony” danger.

claim your free consultation
$500 - Value

Yes, I need help with my case & I want to take advantage of your FREE consultation.